Cuming v. Roderick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Mari A. Cuming against George W. Roderick, impleaded with another. From a-judgment dismissing the complaint after trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
This action was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note made by the defendant Carpenter to the order of the plaintiff, and indorsed before delivery by the defendant Roderick. There have been three trials. On the first trial the complaint was dismissed for insufficiency of proof; but, on appeal from the judgment ■entered on that dismissal, this court held (16 App. Div. 339, 44 N. Y. Supp. 1033) that there was some evidence to go to the jury of the note having been indorsed by Roderick to give Carpenter, the maker, credit with the payee. On the second trial the plaintiff had a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cuming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Cuming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Cuming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Cumming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGrath v. FrancoliniCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915