Legal Opinion

Ringsby v. Timpte

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 26, 1939No. 14,606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Plaintiffs in error brought action for damages for fraud and deceit, based upon alleged misrepresentations in connection with the sale to them of certain refrigerator transportation equipment by defendants. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, on motion of defendants for nonsuit, the action was dismissed. Reversal is sought on application for supersedeas, and, because of the apparent correctness of the disposition of the case by the trial court, we proceed to determine the matter on that application.

The representations relied on for recovery were as follows:

1. That certain large packers, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Van Schaack & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Hart v. ZaitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Flora v. HoeftSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. Aspen Brokers, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API