Phillips v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
“Upon the hearing of a motion for new trial, and in the consideration of a ground of the motion dependent upon newly discovered evidence, where affidavits are introduced supporting and disputing the ground of the motion, the trial judge is the trior of the facts, and it is his province to determine the credibility of the conflicting facts and the contradictory witnesses. A reviewing- court will not in such a; ca'se control his discretion as to the comparative credibility of the witnesses who testified in support of the motion and those who swore to the contrary.” Fouraker v. State, 4 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fouraker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Tyre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Rowland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Southwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Stewart v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955