Legal Opinion

Marriage of Uhl v. Uhl

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1986No. C6-86-727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Larry Uhl, petitioned to dissolve his marriage to respondent, Hyon Uhl. The parties stipulated to the division of marital property and submitted the issue of custody of their two children to the trial court, which granted custody to respondent. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred when it applied the primary parent presumption because the children were old enough to express a preference, and that the trial court’s finding that respondent is a fit parent is clearly erroneous. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Madgett v. MadgettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Schultz v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Benson v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Marriage of Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API