Legal Opinion

Peay v. Capps

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Arre >.L FROM PULASKI CHANCERY COURT. Tíos. T. I). W. Yonley. Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Whytock, Special Supr. Judge.

This is 'a complaint in equity, by Peay, as Receiver of the Real Estate Bank, against Capps’ and Drennen’s heirs and representatives and others, to quiet title and enforce a vendor’s lieu.

The Pulaski Chancery Court decreed that the title to the land in suit be vested in the defendants, the heirs at law and legal representatives of John Dren non, deceased, subject to the lion of the Bank; and that the heirs of Larkin Capps, deceased, and his widow, and the heirs at law, and administrator of the defendant, Joseph Green, ho enjoined from setting up, .or pretending to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dowdle v. Byrd, GuardianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Petroski v. MinzgohrMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lee v. Burrow Timber, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API