Legal Opinion

Donnelly Contracting Co. v. Stanton

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The attachment in this action was issued upon the ground that the defendants were about to dispose of their property with intent to cheat and defraud their creditors. The motion to vacate is based upon the ground, among others, that the proof is insufficient to establish the charge. The *169proof of fraud is contained in an affidavit of a third person, and reads:

'“State oe New Yobk,'|

“ Gou/rvby of Erie, j- ss.:
“ Gity of Buffalo, J
“ John Beedy, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he resides in the city of Buffalo, New York, at No. 140 South Michigan street; that he knows J. W. Stanton and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. West-Side Bank v. MeehanNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wishny v. GottfriedAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Nolan v. Louis Workman Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Seals Piano & Organ Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API