Legal Opinion

State v. Boylston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 22, 1915No. 21161PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge. W. H. Boylston was indicted for embezzlement, a motion to quash the indictment was sustained and the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

The defendant was indicted for embezzling, for the use of one J. R. Brown, the money of a certain state branch bank, contrary to paragraph 7 of section 1 of Act 189 of 1902.

Defendant first moved to quash the indictment on the ground that it set forth no crime or offense known to the laws of the state of Louisiana.

Defendant then, without abandoning said motion, moved to quash the indictment on the further ground that Act 189 of 1902, particularly the seventh paragraph, is unconstitutional and void, for the reason that said act does not express the object in its title, as required by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. KahnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. State v. DalcourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. The People v. De ColaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lacoste v. Department of ConservationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Southern Hide Co. v. BestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  5. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API