GOOD ACRES, INC. v. Jemison
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
11 This appeal arises from a suit on a promissory note. The promisor of the note filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the note prescribed, which the trial court granted. For the reasons that follow, we find that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether prescription on the note was interrupted and reverse.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 7, 1998, Robert Jemison, II (“Mr. Jemison”) signed a promissory note 1 (“Note”) for $140,000 to Good Acres, Incorporated (“Good Acres”), which was par-aphed to the credit sale of 2442 Dryades Street…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. Estate of SantiagoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- King v. Parish National BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Lake Providence Equipment Co. v. Tallulah Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Weintraub v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. CusterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- William F. Grace, Jr. and Anne M. Grace v. Equipco, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023