Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamid

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1983No. 81-1294Published

1Opinion of the Court

461 A.2d 1043 (1983)

UNITED STATES, Appellant,

v.

Abdul HAMID a/k/a Hilvan Jude Finch, Appellee.

No. 81-1294.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued October 5, 1982.

Decided June 2, 1983.

William J. Birney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C. with whom Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., John A. Terry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, and Michael W. Farrell, and Paul L. Knight, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellant.

Timothy D. Junkin, with whom Greta C. Van Susteren, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for appellee.

Before NEBEKER, FERREN and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API