Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1987No. Docket 92916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Tahvonen, J.

In this first party no-fault case, plaintiff appeals as of right from a trial court order granting summary disposition in defendant’s favor, MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10). We affirm.

The facts are not disputed. Mr. Stanley was employed by an automobile dealership as a "body man.” While he was replacing the bumper on a customer’s car, the jack gave way, and the falling car injured him. The plaintiff received workers’ compensation benefits and also sought first party no-fault benefits from his insurer, the defendant here, arguing that the car was "unreasonably parked” at the time of the accident.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bell v. F. J. Boutell Driveaway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. MacDonald v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. North v. KolomyjecMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Gordon v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Trasti v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Tamara Woodring v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Tamara Woodring v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API