Stanley v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Tahvonen, J.
In this first party no-fault case, plaintiff appeals as of right from a trial court order granting summary disposition in defendant’s favor, MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10). We affirm.
The facts are not disputed. Mr. Stanley was employed by an automobile dealership as a "body man.” While he was replacing the bumper on a customer’s car, the jack gave way, and the falling car injured him. The plaintiff received workers’ compensation benefits and also sought first party no-fault benefits from his insurer, the defendant here, arguing that the car was "unreasonably parked” at the time of the accident.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Bell v. F. J. Boutell Driveaway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- MacDonald v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- North v. KolomyjecMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gordon v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Trasti v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tamara Woodring v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Tamara Woodring v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.