Legal Opinion

Mann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2008No. 28273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Tony L. Mann (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. 1 Movant asserts six points of motion court error. We affirm the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court.

The record reveals Movant was charged by Felony Information with one count of the Class A felony of assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, a violation of section 565.081.1, and one count of the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, a violation of section 571.015.

A bench trial was held on August 19, 2002. 2 The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. McSwainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE CARE AND TREATMENT OF DONALD PECKHAM, a/k/a DONALD D. PECKHAM, a/k/a DONALD DEAN PECKHAM v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Petitioner-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. TOMMY R. MORRIS v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API