Legal Opinion
Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 16, 1988No. 87-505Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
486 U.S. 140 (1988)
CHICK KAM CHOO ET AL.
v.
EXXON CORP. ET AL.
No. 87-505.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 30, 1988
Decided May 16, 1988
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Benton Musslewhite, pro se, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Joseph C. Blanks, pro se, Joel I. Klein, and David Boyd.
James Patrick Cooney argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · O'ConnorJustice O'Connor
This case concerns the propriety of an injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The injunction prohibited specified…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.