Bowles v. Bowles
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
This is a child support modification case.
*1017Following ore terms proceedings, the trial court increased the husband’s child support obligations from $125 to $260 per month.
The husband appeals and we affirm.
The husband dispositively contends that the trial court’s action increasing his child support payments is reversible error. We disagree.
We note at the outset the following well-settled law regarding a trial court’s modification of child support:
“Child support payments may be modified where there has been a material change in the circumstances since the entry of the last judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte BoleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Sams v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR., ETC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Fuller v. FullerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Moseley v. MoseleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wylie v. WylieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990