Legal Opinion

Diaz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*300Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2005, which granted the motion of defendants New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims against them for failure to state a cause of action and for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 31, 2005, which granted plaintiff’s motion for renewal and reargument, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. FernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Malawer v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Malawer v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API