Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Byrne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated April 19, 1996, as denied her application for temporary child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court, Kings County, should have set forth the factors it considered in reaching its determination with respect *690to temporary child support. Remittitur is not necessary, however, as the Appellate Division’s authority in this area is as broad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beige v. BeigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. O'Connor v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Ragusa v. CapetolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Zummo v. ZummoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barone v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Rizk v. RizkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API