Swank v. Hufnagle
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant sued the appellee, Melissa Hufnagle, and her husband, upon a note and mortgage executed in Darke county, Ohio, on land situate in this State. The appellee, Melissa Hufnagle, answered that she was a married woman, and that the mortgage was executed by her as the surety of her husband, and assumed to convey land in this State owned by her. The appellant replied that the contract was made in Ohio, and that by a statute of that State a married woman had power to execute such a mortgage, but the statute of Ohio is not set forth.
The trial court did right in adjudging the reply bad.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilson v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Tyler v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Milligan v. State ex rel. Children's Home of CincinnatiIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Mendenhall v. GatelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Bank of Commerce v. FuquaMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Thomson v. KyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Gibson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- McKnight v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.