Legal Opinion

Rausch v. Aronson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1941No. 32,771PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

James Rausch and Math Rausch initiated proceedings before the state department of agriculture, dairy and food pursuant to L. 1931, c. 394, as amended by L. 1935, c. 186 (Mason St. 1938 Snpp. §§ 6240-18% to 6240-18%q) to enforce the conditions of a wholesale produce dealer’s bond. The commissioner of agriculture, after hearing, allowed both claims. No settlement being effected within 15 days as provided in .the act, plaintiffs, with the approval of the commissioner, brought separate actions in the district court, where the cases were tried to the court without a jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Peterson-Biddick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Lee v. Peoples Cooperative Sales Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Schlick v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Bolstad v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Witzman v. SjobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Lindstrom v. Minnesota Liquid Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. SchueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API