Ortiz v. Halperin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1100Surrey filed a petition for administrative review (PAR). DHCR granted the PAR on constraint of Matter of J.R.D. Mgt. Corp. v Eimicke (148 AD2d 610, 612), which holds that a complaint must be processed in accordance with "the law as it existed at the time of the determination of the matter” rather than "the law as it existed at the time of the complaint” (see also, Woodner Co. v Eimicke, 160 AD2d 907). The law in effect at the time of the determination required the landlord to produce rent records for only the four-year period prior to the most recent registration of the premises (former…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Century Tower Associates v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- J.R.D. Management Corp. v. EimickeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. EimickeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clear Holding Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000