Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 1990No. 1 CA-CIV 9775Published

1DissentBrooks, Judge

I respectfully dissent on all issues addressed by the majority and would therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

THE ALLEGED BREACH OF THE ESCROW CONTRACT

The crux of the majority opinion is that the documents submitted to Ticor showed Burkons’ intent to subordinate his deed of trust only to a construction loan. I disagree.

The first document executed by the parties was the real estate purchase contract. This contract is a form agreement and contains the following pertinent handwritten language: “Escrow to contain subordination agreement drawn up by buyer’s attorney on a form…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API