Legal Opinion

United States v. Stuart Steinberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 10, 1975No. 1148, 1150, 1151 and 1200, Dockets 75-1150, 75-1163, 75-1164 and 75-1166PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Stuart Steinberg, William Capo, Howard Kaye and James Parker appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a jury in the Southern District of New York found them guilty of conspiracy to violate the federal narcotics laws (21 U.S.C. § 846 (1970)) and, on varying counts, of knowingly using the telephone to cause and facilitate the conspiracy (21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (1970) ).1 Steinberg and Capo also appeal from their convictions on three substantive counts of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute phencyclidine hydrochloride (“PCP”), a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio TomasuloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API