Legal Opinion
Kamasinski v. Judicial Review Council
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. 420, Docket 94-7276PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Theodore Kamasinski appeals from a judgment entered on January 26, 1994 in the United States District Court *108for the District of Connecticut (Cabranes, then-Chief Judge),* dismissing his complaint. In his complaint, Kamasinski challenged the confidentiality provisions of Conn.Gen.Stat. § 51-511, which relate to proceedings before the Connecticut Judicial Review Council (“JRC”), on First Amendment grounds 843 F.Supp. 811. Under section 51-511, the proceedings of the JRC, the body charged with investigating complaints against judges, are confidential…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Butterworth v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- The First Amendment Coalition, Frederick J. Huysman and Daniel R. Biddle, in 84-1164 v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, in 84-1153Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Whitehead v. Nevada Com'n on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Brad Tschida v. Jonathan MotlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Doe v. GonzalesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.