Vulcan Iron Works, Inc. v. Polish American MacHinery Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
In connection with litigation pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the plaintiffs in that action served deposition subpoenas on the Commercial Attache and Vice Commercial Attache of the Polish Commercial Counselor’s Office in New York City, Anatoliusz Inowolski and Woadyslaw Golab, who are not parties to the New Jersey action. Inowolski and Golab did not appear for the depositions noticed in the subpoenas, and the plaintiffs move for an order finding them in contempt of court for failing to obey the subpoenas “without adequate…
2Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Penyu Baychev KostadinovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Aidi v. YaronDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Rhee v. DahanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1982
- Vulcan Iron Works, Inc. v. Polish American MacHinery Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979