Schreiber v. Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC GRANTED
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
The court has granted the appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc, because, as demonstrated by the uncontested factual recitals in the dissenting opinion, the panel majority’s affirmance has created a lack of uniformity within the meaning of Fla.R. App.P. 9.331(a)1 in this court’s decisions in this case and in Florida National Bank & Trust Co. at Miami v. Havris, 366 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
*913Upon consideration of the merits, we adhere to Havris and adopt the dissenting panel opinion as the opinion and decision of this court.2-3…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
- McAllister v. McAllisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Daniell v. SherrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-GeneralSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chase Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Schreiber v. CHASE FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982