People v. Pereau
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for so much of the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court as holds that the jury could infer defendant’s intent to rape from his conduct and the surrounding circumstances (People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296, 301) and could find that he acted to “carry the project forward within dangerous proximity to the criminal end to be attained” (People v Werblow, 241 NY 55,61). We also agree that it was not error under these circumstances for the trial court to refuse to charge the misdemeanor of coercion in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WerblowNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Coleman v. . EyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.