Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles W. Lahey and John P. Currens
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 23, 1995No. 94-2203, 94-2204PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Charles W. Lahey and John P. Currens were convicted by a jury of conspiring to obstruct justice by agreeing that Currens would provide false testimony to a grand jury investigating Lahey. The defendants challenge their convictions on several grounds. We affirm.
I
Lahey is an attorney who was licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana and whose practice was based in South Bend, Indiana. In June 1989, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) notified Lahey and his wife, Jennifer, that their tax returns for the years 1986 and 1987 had been selected for an audit. The IRS…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Rodney McLee and Vicki Murph-JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jim Gee and William C. Norris, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Mark GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BentleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Richard D. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.