Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Cobb

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 23, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 N.J. Super. 439 (1976)

354 A.2d 355

FRANCIS CARROLL, WILLIAM TORTORIELLO AND JOHN ALMY, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILIARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

CAROL COBB, CLERK OF WOODLAND TOWNSHIP, AND BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 27, 1975.

Decided February 23, 1976.

Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.

Mr. Mark A. De Marco argued the cause for appellant Carol Cobb (Messrs. Donio & De Marco, attorneys).

Mr. Michael S. Bokar, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Worden v. Mercer County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Perri v. KisselbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Edelstein v. FerrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. In re the Alleged Lunacy of LindsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Bonsanto's ApplicationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. State ex rel. League of Women Voters v. Advisory Comm. to the N.M. Compilation Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hayes v. GulliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. I/M/O Absentee Ballots Cast by Five Residents of Trenton Psychiatric HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API