Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Herrera

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1974No. 1242Published

1DissentLopez, Judge

The decision of the majority today makes the penalties for repeated trafficking in heroin and possession of eight ounces of marijuana the same. This result is clearly not what the legislature intended. Indeed, the whole legislative scheme of varied penalties depending upon the seriousness of the offense and the dangerousness of the drug has been abrogated. The reason is apparently because the term “second degree felony” is not defined in the correct volume of our code. It is this type of “judicial legislation” by technicality which is to be avoided.

The major issue involved in this appeal is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Barnett v. Cal M, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. FerrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API