Legal Opinion

Magellsen v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 27, 1972No. 9:20-mcr-00008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against these defendants with jurisdiction based on the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1811, et seq. Specifically, jurisdiction is based on Section 1819, which makes Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (F.D.I.C.) a corporation which can sue and be sued.

Plaintiff was the major shareholder, managing director and creator of two banks. He applied for insurance with F.D.I.C. on January 15, 1970. This insurance was not favorably acted upon until November 25,1970. Plaintiff alleges:

1. That defendants…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  5. Florence O'CampO v. Edna Hardisty, Paul H. Wright, R. v. Rushford, N. P. Hughes and N. DrakulichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Park Ridge, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. First Savings & Loan Ass'n v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1981
  4. Sarraga v. Girod Vela & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
  5. Hoffman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API