Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Szybiak

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1949No. 3777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, C. J.

The statute under which these actions were brought reads as follows: “23. Liability of Owner. Any person to whom or to whose property damage may be occasioned by a dog not owned or kept by him shall be entitled to recover such damage of the person who owns or keeps the dog, or has it in possession, unless the damage was occasioned to him while he was in the commission of a trespass or other tort.”

It is the contention of the defendants that the plaintiff Elaine was engaged in the commission of a trespass at the time of her injury and is, therefore, barred from recovery under the statute. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  2. Foley v. Town of LeeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Martha Mogaji v. Rosa Chan, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
  4. Cappuchi v. BranchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Foley, et al. v. Town of Lee, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API