Wilde v. Trainor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county: No. 92, to October and November Term 1868. This was tin action of ejectment brought, April 29th 1867, by George W. Wilde against James Trainor and others, who were tenants of Sarah E. Colinburgh, for a lot of ground in Allegheny City.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county: No. 92, to October and November Term 1868. This was tin action of ejectment brought, April 29th 1867, by George W. Wilde against James Trainor and others, who were tenants of Sarah E. Colinburgh, for a lot of ground in Allegheny City. The plaintiff being the owner of the lot in question and other land, on the 20th of January 1860 conveyed that lot and another to Robert M. Parke, in trust as to the first, that his wife Susan Wilde “ is to take this lot in fee simple for the sole and separate use of the said Susan Wilde, her heirs and assigns for…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered, January 9th 1869, by
Sharswood, J.
This cause comes up from the judgment of the court below on certain points reserved on the trial. The power to make such reservation depends on the provisions of the Act of June 12th 1839, entitled “ An act relating to the several courts in the county of Allegheny,” Pamph. L. 262, by the 5th section *442of which it is declared that “ It shall he lawful for any of the said judges, when he thinks it expedient, to reserve questions of law which may arise on the trial for the consideration and judgment of both of the judges of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Newhard v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Fisher v. ScharadinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Boyle v. Borough of Mahanoy CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Casey v. Pennsylvania Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Koons v. McNameeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.