Legal Opinion

State v. Colon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 10, 1993No. 11454; 11693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

This consolidated appeal arises from the action of the trial court in rendering judgments of dismissal in two criminal cases. The judgments followed orders suppressing evidence in both cases for the reason that the document purporting to be an affidavit supporting the search and seizure warrant involved in both cases lacked a completed jurat.1 The court gave permission to the state to appeal both judgments. The state presents the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the lack of a completed jurat on the document offered to *404support a search and seizure warrant renders the resulting warrant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. LemoineConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API