Legal Opinion

Washington Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. Kelly

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1944No. 218PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $1250 in a suit for injuries caused by drinking from a bottle of coca cola manufactured by defendant, in which a dead mouse was found. Defendant appeals.

The first assignment of error deals with the refusal of the trial judge to permit the jury to inspect the plant of defendant where the coca cola was prepared and bottled. The request was made at the outset of the trial, repeated at the end of plaintiff’s case, and again at the close of all the evidence.

This question of inspection by the jury, or “view” as it has frequently come to be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dyson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  4. Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Altemus v. TalmadgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. March v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Mann v. Robert C. Marshall, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Barron v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API