Legal Opinion
People v. Pulizzi
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided November 30, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, M.
Defendant herein is charged with a violation of the provisions of section 101 of article 7 of the Traffic Regulations of the City of New York in that he did operate a motor vehicle which was not provided with adequate four-wheel brakes. Said section requires (subds. 2, 3, 4):
“ 2. Every motor vehicle shall have brakes which are capable of bringing it to a full stop when operated at 20 miles an hour *406on dry pavement on level ground within the following distances from the point where such brakes are first applied:
2 wheel brakes ............................ 45 feet
4 wheel brakes…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Amelsburg v. LunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Schaeffer v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Joyce v. BrockettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Joyce v. . BrockettNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WillersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. TroianoNassau County District Court · 1990
- State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982