Legal Opinion

People v. Pulizzi

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided November 30, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, M.

Defendant herein is charged with a violation of the provisions of section 101 of article 7 of the Traffic Regulations of the City of New York in that he did operate a motor vehicle which was not provided with adequate four-wheel brakes. Said section requires (subds. 2, 3, 4):

“ 2. Every motor vehicle shall have brakes which are capable of bringing it to a full stop when operated at 20 miles an hour *406on dry pavement on level ground within the following distances from the point where such brakes are first applied:

2 wheel brakes ............................ 45 feet

4 wheel brakes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Amelsburg v. LunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Schaeffer v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Joyce v. BrockettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Joyce v. . BrockettNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WillersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. TroianoNassau County District Court · 1990
  4. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API