State v. Kermoade
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1ConcurrenceMalone, J.
The majority opinion begins by repeating the long-held standard of review by Kansas appellate courts that the existence and voluntariness of a consent to search and seizure is a question of fact to be decided in light of the totality of the circumstances and will not be overturned on appeal unless clearly erroneous. State v. Rexroat, 266 Kan. 50, 54-55, 966 P.2d 666 (1998); State v. Johnson, 253 Kan. 356, 364, 856 P.2d 134 (1993); State v. Ruden, 245 Kan. 95, 105, 774 P.2d 972 (1989); State v. Pearson, 234 Kan. 906, 920, 678 P.2d 605 (1984); State v. Buckner, 223 Kan. 138, 144, 574 P.2d 918…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. VandervortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.