Legal Opinion

Sealift Bulkers, Inc. v. Republic of Armenia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2000No. Civil Action 95-1293 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter arises from a charter agreement between plaintiff, Sealift Bulkers, Inc., and defendant, the Republic of Armenia, to transport wheat to Armenia during a time of famine. Plaintiff brought this lawsuit to recover the money it spent to warehouse the wheat on another ship when it was delayed in port by civil unrest in the Republic of Georgia. Plaintiff claims that defendant is responsible for reimbursing it under the charter because the expenses were “special charges” — expenses incurred “for the safety and preservation of the cargo!”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Styria, Scopinich v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. The JasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. The WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  4. Orient Mid-East Lines, Inc. v. Shipment of RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft Mbh, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Placid Refining Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Overseas Philadelphia, LLC v. World Council of Credit Unions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Billings v. Manorcare of Wichita, KS LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API