Nahay v. Arkansas Irrigation Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Grifrin Smith, Chief Justice.
Because lands designated in the complaint would be overflowed by a dam it had constructed across Bayou La Grue, Arkansas Irrigation Company sought to condemn. Separate suits were consolidated when answers and cross complaints were filed.- Prairie County Irrigation Company intervened, asserting it had previously acquired easements in respect of the property involved.
The Chancellor found (a) that Arkansas Irrigation Company, a corporation, had power of eminent domain; (b) under the Company’s prospectus waters would be impounded in the bayou to a maximum depth of 207…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butler v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Smith v. Arkansas Irrigation CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watkins v. Lawrence County, ArkansasDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
- Watkins v. Lawrence County, ArkansasDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023