Legal Opinion

Dana A. Hinckley and Adelaide Hinckley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1969No. 19258_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.

Dana A. Hinckley, the taxpayer, petitions this court, pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 7482, for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States reflecting his tax liability for the year 1962. 1 In that year the taxpayer sold certain of his assets consisting of printing equipment, minor tools, supplies, and the land and building where the “Claremont News” was located. The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax of $128.42 for the year 1962 and the taxpayer claimed an overpayment of $852.99 of income tax for the same year. Subsequently, the Commissioner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Bolen Webb and Cornelia Webb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Charles Dodge Christine Y. Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Donnell R. Mattingly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Pfizer Inc. v. Lancaster County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Vincent M. Coomes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Coomes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API