Legal Opinion
Witty v. Fortunoff
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 2, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
286 N.J. Super. 280 (1996)
669 A.2d 244
CECIL WITTY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
FORTUNOFF, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 31, 1995.
Decided January 2, 1996.
Before Judges ARNOLD M. STEIN, KESTIN,[1] and CUFF.
Amirali Y. Haidri argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Haidri, of counsel and on the briefs).
Roberto J. Benites argued the cause for respondent (Robert W. Frieland, attorney; Mr. Benites on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, J.A.D.
Petitioner Cecil Witty appeals from an order dismissing his petition for workers'…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pfahler v. Eclipse Pioneer Division of Bendix Aviation Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Sa v. H. L. Harrison & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Mangieri v. Spring Tool Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- O'KEEFE v. Johansen Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Pfahler v. Eclipse, Etc., Bendix Aviation Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brodak v. ViscontiColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- JOSEPH HAHN VS. UPS FREIGHT (DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996