Legal Opinion

Wick v. McLennan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1916No. 5603PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County ; W. F. Ezell, Judge. Action by L. W. McLennan against Frank W. Wick, J. 6. Fowler, and C. S. Fowler, as partners in the Wick-Fowler Colonization Company, with counterclaim by defendants. Judgment for plaintiff against defendants, and for defendants Fowler over against defendant Wick, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Appellants’ statement of the case is adopted, as follows:

Plaintiff (appellee), in his first amended original petition, sought to recover from Frank W. Wick, J. G. Fowler, and O. S. Fowler, as partners in the Wick-Fowler Colonization Company, certain real estate commissions claimed due on a sale made to J. A. Burton and a sale to P. E. Nispel and E. S. Krause, under a general agent’s contract with said partnership, a copy of which contract was attached to the petition as an ex-Mbit. In addition to stating that plaintiff was the procuring cause of said sales, this petition, in line with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. CabinessTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hancock v. StacyTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kingsbury v. Waco State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. English v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Union Meat Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dallas Ry. Co. v. HallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. John Maynard Lumber Co. v. BrazellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Dismukes v. GilmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Dallas Ry. Co. v. HallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Dismukes v. GilmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API