Commonwealth v. Poplawski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
RANSOM, J.:
Appellant, George Poplawski, appeals from the judgment of sentence of eighteen months of probation, as well as restitution in the amount of $41,637.00. We vacate and remand.
The facts underlying Appellant’s conviction are unnecessary to the disposition of his appeal. However, we briefly summarize the procedural history of his case as follows. Appellant was arrested and charged with theft by deception, deceptive or fraudulent business practices, and home improvement fraud for receiving advance payment for services that he failed to perform. 1 Following a jury trial in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarriottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. DohnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Muhammed, Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Solomon, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Borrajo, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Greiner, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.