Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Poplawski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2017No. Com. v. Poplawski, G. No. 820 MDA 2016PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

RANSOM, J.:

Appellant, George Poplawski, appeals from the judgment of sentence of eighteen months of probation, as well as restitution in the amount of $41,637.00. We vacate and remand.

The facts underlying Appellant’s conviction are unnecessary to the disposition of his appeal. However, we briefly summarize the procedural history of his case as follows. Appellant was arrested and charged with theft by deception, deceptive or fraudulent business practices, and home improvement fraud for receiving advance payment for services that he failed to perform. 1 Following a jury trial in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarriottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. DohnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Com. v. Muhammed, Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Solomon, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Borrajo, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Greiner, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API