Risk v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Nita A. Risk (“Risk”), alleges that her employer, defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), discriminated against her on the basis of her sex, female, and retaliated against her for complaining about alleged sexual discrimination and harassment, in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”). Ford comes before us on its partial motion to dismiss, contending that a number of Risk’s claims are barred as untimely since they allegedly occurred more than 300 days prior…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alvarez v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Vander Meer-Weiss v. Roundy's Supermarkets IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020