Legal Opinion
In Re: Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2705(b) for Grand Jury Subpoena Gj2014031422765
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 2014No. Misc. No. 2014-0296PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
The government challenges two orders issued by Magistrate Judge John Facciola regarding the government’s application for an order under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b). The first order invited Yahoo!, Inc. (“Yahoo”) to intervene as a respondent and file a notice with the court on whether Yahoo intended to be heard on the merits of the government’s application. The second order instructed the government to file a public, redacted copy of its application and draft order. Because the express terms of 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) and applicable legal precedent…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Search Warrant for: [Redacted]@Hotmail.comDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Easterday v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Woods v. ScissonsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019