Legal Opinion

Tritschler v. Merck & Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 14, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

66 N.J. Super. 116 (1961)

168 A.2d 666

HANNA TRITSCHLER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

MERCK & COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 27, 1961.

Decided March 14, 1961.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Petitioner, widow of Frank Tritschler, an employee of respondent,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Gilligan v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Yeomans v. City of JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Augustin v. Bank Building and Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Correction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Union Producing Co. v. Dependents of SimpsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Burkley v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API