Legal Opinion

Bohlen v. United States

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 18, 1985No. 80-3186PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL OPINION

MILLS, District Judge.

Courts universally look upon settlements with great favor and encourage their use since it is a peaceable resolution of a dispute arrived at by mutual and voluntary agreement. The cases so holding are myriad.

But the settlement here—regrettably— cannot be enforced since one of the parties to the agreement was not cloaked with adequate authority to bind his client.

Plaintiff asks the Court to enforce a settlement agreement which Defendant denies ever existed. The underlying cause of action alleges a wrongful death resulting from a swine flue vaccine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. KatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. United States v. John M. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. 32.40 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, Situated In Leelanau County, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. United States Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Turner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API