Legal Opinion

Sapp v. Conrad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 1970No. Nos. M-331, M-332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed from two final judgments approving the valuation placed upon their land by the Tax Assessor of Bay County for the years 1967 and 1968, denying plaintiffs’ prayer that the land be reclassified as agricultural and entitled to reassessment at a lower value.

Plaintiffs are the owners of three parcels of land which have been identified for the purpose of convenience as Parcel A, Parcel B, and Parcel C. Parcel A consists of approximately 115 acres and is lo*885cated partly in and partly outside the northern corporate limits of the City of Panama City. Parcel B,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyson v. LanierSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Lanier v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Williams v. SimpsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Matheson v. ElcookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. OatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Hausman v. RudkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Conrad v. SappSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Bystrom v. Union Land Inv., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Firstamerica Develop. Corp. v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API