Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Logansport Gaming

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2014No. 13-30645UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

This case concerns the interpretation of an insurance policy issued by Plaintiff-Appellee Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”) to Defendants-Appellants Logansport Gaming, L.L.C., Logansport Truckstop, L.L.C., and Sabine River Restaurant (together “Logansport”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Scottsdale. For the reasons below, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Scottsdale issued Logansport an insurance policy for commercial general liability and property insurance (“the Policy”), insuring a property in Logansport, Louisiana. The property included a truck stop,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. LeMaire v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Smith v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berenato v. Seneca Speciality Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company v. Chicago Metropolitan Hospital, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. Custom Container Solutions, LLC v. Century Surety CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Kinsale Insurance Company v. CD Management of New Orleans, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API