Legal Opinion

Brilliant v. Feinberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1999No. ED 75730PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Judgment creditors appeal from a ruling which they denominate “a final judgment as to” a motion for examination of judgment debtor in which the trial court refused to compel defendant, who had invoked his right against self-incrimination, to respond, even though defendant had received a grant of use immunity from a prosecuting attorney under Section 513.380 RSMo (1994). Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the action appealed from is not an appealable judgment. We sustain the motion and dismiss.

This appeal arises out of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Long v. AskrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Kleinfeld v. Graneto Datsun, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LAKE OSAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PrewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API