National Cash Register Co. v. Gratigny
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeals from the District Court of th^ United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Sater, Judge. Suit in equity by the National Cash Register Company against Jerome T. Gratigny. From the decree, both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Suit for infringement of Ehrlich patent, No. 560,089, May 12, 1896, for cash register, indicator, and check-printer. Defendant is sued as a user of a Hailwood cash register. The District Court dismissed the bill for lack of infringement, and appeal is taken from that decree. Defendant also appeals from an order hereafter referred to.
[1] The Ehrlich device, broadly speaking (and disregarding the registering and printing mechanism), embraces an oscillatory rotatable horizontal cylinder operated by a “motor” in the form of a coiled spring and connecting shaft. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- WM. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. Falls City Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Sterling Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1938
- Knight Soda Fountain Co. v. Walrus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919