Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Voinovich

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 17, 2002No. 02-3232PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Robert W. Johnson appeals pro se from a district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and *2Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1987, an Ohio jury convicted Johnson of possessing a dangerous ordinance, possessing several firearms while under a disability, and felonious…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Issac Lydell Herron v. Jimmy HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wampler v. HandwerkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API