Legal Opinion

People v. Bramlett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 2003No. 1-99-3768PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Defendant Steven Bramlett was charged with first degree murder for the shooting death of Tyree Jones. Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion to quash arrest and suppress the statement he made to the police, which the trial court denied. Thereafter, he was found guilty in a stipulated bench trial and was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment. Defendant now appeals from his conviction, arguing that there was no probable cause for his arrest and that his statement was involuntary and, therefore, inadmissible. No questions are raised on the pleadings.

We concur with the defendant that his motion…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. BussIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. HopkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Holmes v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  5. People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API